Eyes & Ears On Social Media

Alignment Difficulties Aren’t Reserved For Companies

August 26, 2008 – 10:25 pm | by Daryl Tay

You might have read that the Social Media Breakfast | Singapore team had a meeting last week and one of the big issues we discussed (and are still discussing) various ways of partnering up with companies, agencies and organisations for future breakfasts.

The reason why we’re taking so long to come to a conclusion, is because it’s not an easy one to make. Walter mentions the concept of “fit” and that’s something that’s important to us. How does the company view social media? How do they view the community? Is our network something to be leveraged on, or developed? What’s their interest and/or agenda? How transparent are they in revealing this interest/agenda? Does aligning with them discriminate against other brands, companies or agencies?

Lots of tough questions, all not easy to answer. So here’s the challenge: If you’re one of the commercial entities who are looking at partnering with us - send us something that will not only convince us it’s the right move, but leave no shred of doubt that it’s a good move for us, for you and for the community. If you understand social media and community, it shouldn’t be all that hard.

For the bloggers, podcasters and others in the community, how do you deal with this issue? Does any partnership/sponsorship do? Or are there deeper questions to ponder? Comment below!

Tags: , , , , , ,

  1. 4 Responses to “Alignment Difficulties Aren’t Reserved For Companies”

  2. By claudia on Aug 26, 2008 | Reply

    (PLUG)

    Why not have this discussions over at the SMB forum? :)

  3. By Daryl Tay on Aug 26, 2008 | Reply

    @claudia: eh I need content to blog also right! lol!

  4. By brian on Aug 27, 2008 | Reply

    hahaha, doesn’t matter where the conversations take place, as long as there are. (and of course the quality of conversations, any good coming out of it, and everyone benefits!)

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Sep 13, 2008: Unique-Frequency.com » Blog Archive » The “Sponsorship” Debate Continues

Post a Comment