<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why The New Facebook Rocks: Increased Interaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/</link>
	<description>Social Media &#38; Digital Marketing in Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cass</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>Hi Daryl - first time commenting :)

From my friends&#039; (non-social media users) points of view, the increased opportunity for interaction is probably a small plus, if it&#039;s even factored in at all. I&#039;ve seen comments on statuses, but by the same pple who were vocal before the change, and I don&#039;t think that that many have grasped the new opportunities here, because the commenting doesn&#039;t extend to the other updates that can be commented on (eg. joining a new group, relationship statuses etc) I don&#039;t think many users &#039;get&#039; the real-time feed, whereas for friendfeed users it&#039;s a familiar and useful feature.

My friends seem to prefer the old FB interface because they find it easier to access things, while the new FB splits up things unnecessarily. (of course as a social media user I love the new stuff this surfaces and the greater filtering capabilities!) Hopefully, they will eventually be eased into the idea of increased interactivity and participate more :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daryl &#8211; first time commenting <img src='http://uniquefrequency.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From my friends&#8217; (non-social media users) points of view, the increased opportunity for interaction is probably a small plus, if it&#8217;s even factored in at all. I&#8217;ve seen comments on statuses, but by the same pple who were vocal before the change, and I don&#8217;t think that that many have grasped the new opportunities here, because the commenting doesn&#8217;t extend to the other updates that can be commented on (eg. joining a new group, relationship statuses etc) I don&#8217;t think many users &#8216;get&#8217; the real-time feed, whereas for friendfeed users it&#8217;s a familiar and useful feature.</p>
<p>My friends seem to prefer the old FB interface because they find it easier to access things, while the new FB splits up things unnecessarily. (of course as a social media user I love the new stuff this surfaces and the greater filtering capabilities!) Hopefully, they will eventually be eased into the idea of increased interactivity and participate more <img src='http://uniquefrequency.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Tay</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan &amp; Su Yuen: Yes I think convenience, speed and organisation are things I appreciate most about it. Previously I had to hunt hard for almost everything, that I usually just gave up

@iammyy: Yup! It&#039;s a good change, I think! I&#039;ve never actually played wit the bookmark bar... I should take a look!

@Ange: Yes definitely the &quot;photos&quot; tab has made life much easier for me too. It&#039;s probably #2 for me as well, behind IM. Blogs don&#039;t even factor in, mostly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan &#038; Su Yuen: Yes I think convenience, speed and organisation are things I appreciate most about it. Previously I had to hunt hard for almost everything, that I usually just gave up</p>
<p>@iammyy: Yup! It&#8217;s a good change, I think! I&#8217;ve never actually played wit the bookmark bar&#8230; I should take a look!</p>
<p>@Ange: Yes definitely the &#8220;photos&#8221; tab has made life much easier for me too. It&#8217;s probably #2 for me as well, behind IM. Blogs don&#8217;t even factor in, mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ange</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Ange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>I know there are FB groups created wanting the old interface back, but the new one gives a lot more of real-time. I personally use the Twitter app on FB, so that my twitters translates to FB statuses. It&#039;s useful really, especially since the commenting on them is just one click away.

I suppose it has become a new playground, sharing photos become so convenient and that FB photo upload rush happens with my friends after every party/ball/dinner we took pictures in. 

It&#039;s awesome really. It&#039;s probably the no.2 medium of interaction for my friends and I online. Most possibly following behind Windows Live Messenger and even before blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there are FB groups created wanting the old interface back, but the new one gives a lot more of real-time. I personally use the Twitter app on FB, so that my twitters translates to FB statuses. It&#8217;s useful really, especially since the commenting on them is just one click away.</p>
<p>I suppose it has become a new playground, sharing photos become so convenient and that FB photo upload rush happens with my friends after every party/ball/dinner we took pictures in. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s awesome really. It&#8217;s probably the no.2 medium of interaction for my friends and I online. Most possibly following behind Windows Live Messenger and even before blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iammyy</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>iammyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>I think the new Facebook UI is way neater than the old one. It took me some time to get used to the changes but I&#039;d say it looks good and works well (so far). Page loading is much faster compared to the old facebook too.

I like the bookmark bar best because you don&#039;t have to search for your applications anymore ! And of course,your mentioned status updates page does wonders - distraction in class! =x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new Facebook UI is way neater than the old one. It took me some time to get used to the changes but I&#8217;d say it looks good and works well (so far). Page loading is much faster compared to the old facebook too.</p>
<p>I like the bookmark bar best because you don&#8217;t have to search for your applications anymore ! And of course,your mentioned status updates page does wonders &#8211; distraction in class! =x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su Yuen</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Su Yuen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>I prefer the new FB interface to the old one as it is much more cleaner and easier to navigate. 

On the comments about the apps, I actually feel that application developers benefit more as now activities their friends are performing on FB apps actually get sent to the user&#039;s notifications in the bottom right bar. This attracts attention to applications where with the old interface, these were seen as &quot;noise&quot; and often ignored. 

And yes, you are right on the point about good apps with good interactions are still popular. An example is &lt;a href=&quot;apps.facebook.com/packrat&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PackRat&lt;/a&gt; which until today has 73K active users per month. The game is fun, addictive and growing daily as time goes by with the new interface :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the new FB interface to the old one as it is much more cleaner and easier to navigate. </p>
<p>On the comments about the apps, I actually feel that application developers benefit more as now activities their friends are performing on FB apps actually get sent to the user&#8217;s notifications in the bottom right bar. This attracts attention to applications where with the old interface, these were seen as &#8220;noise&#8221; and often ignored. </p>
<p>And yes, you are right on the point about good apps with good interactions are still popular. An example is <a href="apps.facebook.com/packrat" rel="nofollow">PackRat</a> which until today has 73K active users per month. The game is fun, addictive and growing daily as time goes by with the new interface <img src='http://uniquefrequency.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kong</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.com/2008/10/21/why-the-new-facebook-rocks-increased-interaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.com/?p=499#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>Contrary to many of my friends on FB who hates the new UI, I find it better in aggregating my friend&#039;s digital footprint in FB. It&#039;s all within a tab or two. It&#039;s convenient and it&#039;s more social.

It has better privacy controls than before too. One thing I&#039;m not particular happy about is removal of applications. Users might miss it altogether as it&#039;s sitting right at the bottom and require a few clicks to remove them.

It used to be that a profile page load apps and all in one page so with the new UI and tabbing in place, users might miss it. I like it tho, page loads faster than before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to many of my friends on FB who hates the new UI, I find it better in aggregating my friend&#8217;s digital footprint in FB. It&#8217;s all within a tab or two. It&#8217;s convenient and it&#8217;s more social.</p>
<p>It has better privacy controls than before too. One thing I&#8217;m not particular happy about is removal of applications. Users might miss it altogether as it&#8217;s sitting right at the bottom and require a few clicks to remove them.</p>
<p>It used to be that a profile page load apps and all in one page so with the new UI and tabbing in place, users might miss it. I like it tho, page loads faster than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
